I think the second supposition is probably correct! Let’s open the first one! Scientifically, I can’t explain why, but while I always had trouble with the screen protectors I used in the past with my iPhone, the Expert Shield protectors I applied to my X100s and OM-D E-M5 were bubble-free the first time around! So, either I was lucky, or those protectors apply better than most as the company states. With Expert Shield, the first thing I noticed is that they don’t produce bubbles and are very easy to apply. It is a simple operation but requires some patience and a little bit of attention, so if you have had a bad experience with your smartphone, you could be discouraged to do the same with your camera. In my humble opinion, yes, but often, putting on a screen protector may take more time than we’d like, and we always end up with some undesirable air bubbles or with the screen misaligned along the LCD edges. Now, the first question one might ask before investing in a screen protector is: is it really necessary? However, now that I often use mirrorless cameras (which don’t have a screen protector included in the package), the importance of protecting their LCD screens has crossed my mind more than once. With my Nikon DSLRs, a transparent solid screen protector was supplied with the kit, so I never had to worry about protecting my LCD display. But camera screens can be just as vulnerable, which is why protecting them is a good idea. We have the tendency to think that smartphones are more likely to be scratched because we place them everywhere – in our pockets, or in our bags, both of which are filled with potentially hazardous objects such as keys or pens. Screen protectors tend to be a given for our smartphones, but it is less common to use them on digital camera LCD displays.
The following reflects my thoughts and my thoughts only about its products.
Ethics statement: I have been asked by Expert Shield UK to test their screen protectors but I haven’t been paid to do so.
0 kommentar(er)
